Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167557 (ALL)

BANGALI PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/9621/2025 · 2025-09-26

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9621 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "(i). issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents particularly to respondent no-3 to pay the 1/3 share of compensation amount of khata no. 91 khasra no. 651 measuring 5-0-4-0 bhigha situated in Village Saleh Nagar Pargana Bijnor Tahseel Sarojni Nagar District Lucknow to the petitioner along with statutory 15% interest as provided under section 34 of the land Acquisition Act 1894 from the date of possession of land till the date of actual payment." 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the description of respondent no.3 is incorrect and he prays for liberty to correct the same during the course of the day. 4. Let necessary correction be incorporated during the course of the day. 5. It is the case of the petitioner that the Presiding Officer, (Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Settlement Authority), Lucknow has dismissed Reference filed under Section 13 of the Land Acquisition Act by private persons against the award of compensation to the petitioner. Yet compensation has not been made to the petitioner. The petitioner has already made a representation in this regard on 24.10.2024 to the Additional District Magistrate, (Land Acquisition), Nagar Mahapalika, Lucknow- respondent No.3, which representation is pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saroj Kumar Shukla, Shailendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bangali Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. September 26, 2025 Pks WRIC No. 9621 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench