Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167548 (ALL)

SHUBHAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9273/2025 · 2025-10-09

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9273 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the respondents no.1 to 3. 2. In view of order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent no.4 is dispensed with. 3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 4. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents no.2 and 3 not to harass and adopt any coercive measures against the petitioner and his family members in pursuance to FIR no.258 of 2025, under Sections 140(1) of B.N.S., Police Station Ramkot, District Sitapur, lodged against unknown person. 5. The matter pertains to a lady having gone missing. 6. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Vinod Kumar, Sub- Inspector, Police Station Rampur, District Sitapur, dated 25.09.2025 states that after investigation the connivance of the petitioner has not been found. He further states that the petitioner would not be harassed in any manner. 7. The aforesaid statement of learned AGA is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Shubham .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench