[2025:RJ-JP:25161] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 287/2014 IN S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3727/2011 1. Police Adhikshak Bharatpur Rajasthan Vahan Swami Gypsy RJ.05.C2122 2. Rajasthan Sarkar Tamil Jariya Jiladeesh, Bharatpur 3. Shri Rajender Prasad Meena s/o Shri Prabhata Ram Meena Muljim D.S.P. S.T/ S.C. Cell Bharatpur (In charge Gypsy) ----Appellants/Non-Claimants Versus 1. Mahadevi aged 46 years w/o late Shri Yadram 2. Gopal S/o late Shri Yadram aged 30 years 3. Kamlesh Kumar d/o Late Shri Yadram aged 25 years 4. Brijesh Kumari d/o Late Shri Yadram aged 21 years. 5. Kalpana Kumari d/o Late Shri Yadram aged 18 years. 6. Gajendar Singh s/o Late Shri Yadram aged 16 years. 7. Devendar Singh s/o Late Shri Yadram aged 14 years. (No.6 and 7 both minors through their mother and natural guardian Smt.Mahadevi wife of Late Yadram) All resident of Vikas Nagar Colony, behind New Hospital, Bharatpur Rajasthan ----Respondent/Claimants 8. Rajendar Singh s/o Shri Dalchand and Kalyan Singh s/o Shri Patre resident of Sikrai Char Hissa, Tehsil Kirawali, Faehpur Jariya Mukhtayar Am Kalyan s/o Shri Patre r/o Sikrai Char Hissa, Tehsil Kirawali District Agra- Malik Tractor No.UP.80.AV.6378 9. Padam Singh s/o Shri Shivram resident of Khera Jat Fatehpur Sikri Char Hissa, Tehsil Kirawali, District Agra- Chalak Tractor No.UP.80.AV.6378. 10. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Tamil Jariya Branch Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited Branch New Mandi Station Road, Bharatpur 11. Jagdish Constable (Chalak) Shri Rajendar Prasad Meena D.S.P. ST/SC Cell Bharatpur ------Respondents/Non-claimants For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None [2025:RJ-JP:25161] (2 of 2) [CRES-287/2014] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 08/07/2025 No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. From the record of the case, it is revealed that on 06.03.2024, this Court while condoning the delay in filing civil restoration application, allowed the restoration application, subject to deposition of cost of Rs.2,000/- with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority by the appellant. It was also specifically made clear that the cost was to be deposited within three weeks from 06.03.2024. Even after lapse of more than one year and four months, the cost imposed by this Court has not been deposited. Such kind of laxity cannot be permitted. Therefore, the present restoration application is dismissed for want of deposition of the cost as imposed by this Court vide order dated 06.03.2024. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /29