APHC010224782017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32783/2017 Between: 1. KOLLA RAMESH BABU,PRAKASAM DIST., OCC. EMPLOYEE IN CUMBUM COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED R/O. H NO. 2-61B, JAYAPRAKASH STREET, CUMBUM, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P COOP HYDERABAD 3 OTRS, DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION SECRETARIAT. HYDERABAD 2. THE CUMBUM COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, / PRESIDENT KAMBAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 3. THE CUMBUM COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS SECRETARY, KAMBAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER MARKAPUR PRAKASAM, DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned removal order dated 20.07.2017 issued by the 2nd respondents bank as arbitrary, illegal and unjust and in violtion of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service by setting aside the order dt. 20.07.2017 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 40757 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned removal order dated 20-07-2017 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R K SURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE 3 The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned removal order dated 20.07.2017 issued by the 2nd respondents bank as arbitrary illegal and unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service by setting aside the order dt. 20.07.2017...” 2. 20.07.2017...” 2. Sri R.K. Suri, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 01.09.2025 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.32783 of 2017 01.09.2025 BSM