SMT RAJESH KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. State of UP AND ANOTHER
CRLR/464/2024 · 2025-09-15
Harvir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 464 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionists has stated at the Bar that the charge in Case Crime No. 346 of 2020, under Sections 452, 307, 506 and 120B I.P.C. has already been framed against the revisionists and the trial has commenced.
3. Under the circumstances, the present revision has lost it relevance. However, it shall remain open to the revisionists to take appropriate legal remedy in accordance with law, if so advised.
4. The present revision stands dismissed as having become infructuous. September 16, 2025 Faridul Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ram Prakash Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akhilesh Srivastava, G.A., Saksham Srivastava (Harvir Singh,J.) Smt Rajesh Kumari And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad