Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167504 (ALL)

KALAVATI v. LEARNED TEHSILDAR JUDICIAL / COURT CONCERNED, TEHSIL, GONDA AND ANOTHER

A227/5892/2025 · 2025-09-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5892 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar (Judicial)/ Court Concerned, Tehsil Gonda, District Gonda to decide the Suit No.RST/7338/2024, Computerized Case No.T202408300407338, "Kalavati vs. Smt. Sumer", under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Decide as per Revenue Code Rule 2016 under Rule 34(7), expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar (Judicial)/ Court Concerned, Tehsil Gonda, District Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid suit in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar (Judicial)/ Court Concerned, Tehsil Gonda, District Gonda is directed to decide the Suit No.RST/7338/2024, Computerized Case No.T202408300407338, "Kalavati vs. Smt. Sumer", under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vayu Nandan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kalavati .....Petitioner(s) Learned Tehsildar Judicial / Court Concerned, Tehsil, Gonda And Another .....Respondent(s) 2006 (Decide as per Revenue Code Rule 2016 under Rule 34(7), expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 KR A227 No. 5892 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench