HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 11 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present revision has been filed along with the delay condonation application challenging the order dated 30.04.2019 whereby, the application preferred for impleadment under Order I Rule 10 of C.P.C. was rejected as well as the order dated 28.08.2025 whereby, the review application was dismissed. 3. The stamp reporting section has marked defects of delay against the order dated 30.04.2015, however, as the revisionists had preferred a review, which was decided on 28.08.2025, the delay in challenging the said order is condoned. 4. The present revision has been filed challenging an interlocutory order whereby, the request of the revisionists, who are tenants, for impleadment was rejected as well as the order, by which, the review application was rejected. 5. Considering the facts that both the orders are interlocutory in nature, no interference is called for at this stage. 6. The revisionists are at liberty to challenge all the orders including both Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Rajendra Kumar, Narendra Kumar Kashyap, Sri Gaurav Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shri Chandrashekhar Nishad And Others .....Revisionist(s) Mrs. Meera Verma And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) the orders challenged in the present revision, when the matter is finally decided by the appellate court. 7. Since, the regular civil appeal is pending since 2012, directions are issued to decide Regular Civil Appeal No.244 of 2012 in accordance with law with all expedition preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is also directed that the SCC Revision No.59 of 2010 shall also be decided within the same period and in accordance with law. It is also made clear that no unnecessary adjournments shall be granted to any of the parties. 8. The parties would be at liberty to take such steps that may be required to press their rights before the appellate court as well as revisional court. 9. The Senior Registrar of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned for information and compliance. September 24, 2025 akverma CLRED No. 11 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench