Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167479 (ALL)

SADDAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1380/2025 · 2025-09-25

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1380 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Dixit, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.195 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, registered at Police Station Sareni, District Raebareli. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press this bail application as the applicant wants to appear before the trial court and seek her release on bail. 4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 25, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Saddam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench