RANJEET MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9389/2025 · 2025-09-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167477 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167477 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9389 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Dinesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.749 of 2020, under Sections 506, 504, 352, 420, 406 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 08.11.2020 against two named persons, including the applicant, and an unnamed person, on the basis of an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., stating that the complainant runs a building material shop, the applicant is his old acquaintance. On the allurement of the applicant, the complainant had made investment of Rs.11,00,000/- in M/s SSG Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. and the applicant had purchased material worth Rs.10,00,000/- but the applicant did not pay the sale consideration of the material and nor did he give any return on the investment. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in 11 other cases has been disclosed in the affidavit, in two of which a closure report has been submitted and in 6 cases he has been released on bail. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the F.I.R. has been lodged for a recovery of money which is essentially of civil in nature. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail applicant and she has submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Chandra Shukla, Vishal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjeet Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
sheet has been submitted on 05.08.2021. 7.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.06.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant - Ranjeet Maurya be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 26, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9389 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench