HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9358 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Arjun Singh Kalhans, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri S.P. Singh, learned Counsel for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 252 of 2024, under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 20.06.2024 against five persons, including the applicant stating that the co- accused Pankaj Mishra has got a sale deed executed by co-accused Amitabh Srivastava in respect of the complainant's land. The applicant has witnessed the execution of the sale deed. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in another criminal case has been disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of bail application, in which his arrest has been stayed by this Court. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the purchaser Pankaj Mishra has already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court by means of an order dated 23.05.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.565 of 2025. 5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 30.08.2025 and a co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail in this case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arjun Singh Kalhans, Amit Kumar Verma, Himanshu Singh Chauhan, Saurabh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Vipin Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 25, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 9358 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench