APHC010223742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. JALLI NARASIMHULU, s/o late Penchilaiah Aged about 74 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o Reddy Kottala village, S.A.K.N mandal, YSR Kadapa District AP. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secret Home-Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. the Superintendent of police, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The CircleInspector of police, Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The SubInspector of police, Poruma District. 5. Pullacheruvu Rajashekar reddy, s/o Gurivi Reddy, aged about 60 years, occ-cultivation, Angampally village porumamilla Mandal YSR Kadapa District AP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11322 OF 2024 1. JALLI NARASIMHULU, s/o late Penchilaiah Aged about 74 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o Reddy Kottala village, S.A.K.N mandal, YSR Kadapa District ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secret Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. the Superintendent of police, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The CircleInspector of police, Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa 4. The SubInspector of police, Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa 5. Pullacheruvu Rajashekar reddy, s/o Gurivi Reddy, aged about 60 years, cultivation, Angampally village porumamilla Mandal YSR Kadapa District ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. JALLI NARASIMHULU, s/o late Penchilaiah Aged about 74 years, Occ- Cultivation, R/o Reddy Kottala village, S.A.K.N mandal, YSR Kadapa District ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secretaiy Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 3. The CircleInspector of police, Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa milla Police Station, YSR Kadapa 5. Pullacheruvu Rajashekar reddy, s/o Gurivi Reddy, aged about 60 years, cultivation, Angampally village porumamilla Mandal YSR Kadapa District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents no.2 to 4 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused/respondent no.5 on petitioner complaint dtl9.8.2022 and on 19.4.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 to Register, petitioner complaint the FIR/crime against the accused on dtl9.8.2022 and 19.4.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to direct Respondents No. 2 to 4 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused on petitioner complaint dtl9.8.2022 and 19.4.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: JESHTADI SUNIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11322 OF 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Respondents no.2 to 4 to Register the FIR/crime against the accused/respondent no.5 on petitioner complaint dtl9.8.2022 and on 19.4.2024 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 to Register, petitioner complaint the FIR/crime against the accused on dtl9.8.2022 and 19.4.2024 and pass..” 2. Heard Sri Jeshtadi Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the subject matter is civil in nature, the police authorities are not interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and in view of the fact that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are required in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stands closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025. KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11322 OF 2024 03.09.2025 KKV