VIKRAM KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. SECTT. LKO.
BAIL/9374/2025 · 2025-09-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167405 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167405 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9374 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Kaushal Kishore Tewari, the learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Mayank Sinha, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Case Crime No.284 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 333, 352, 351(3), 3(5) B.N.S, registered at Police Station- Haiderabad, District- Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 10.08.2025 against four persons including the applicants stating that a co- accused person- Dal Chand assaulted the informant's husband by a baka and when some other family members tried to save him, they were also beaten up. The applicants are said have accompanied the accused Dal Chand. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicants are innocent persons, they have been falsely implicated in the present case and they have no criminal history. 5. In the statement of the injured person/victim, he also assigned the role of causing injury to the co-accused Dal Chand. He did not assign any specific role to the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kaushal Kishore Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikram Kumar And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and investigation in the present case is still going on. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that no specific role has been assigned to the applicants by the victim coupled with the fact that the applicants are having no criminal history and applicant no.1 and 2 are languishing in jail since 03.09.2025 and 06.09.2025, respectively, whereas the investigation is still going on, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicants on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicants- Vikram Kumar and Rajnees be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing separate personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 26, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9374 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench