( 2025:JHHC:17831 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5367 of 2025 ------ Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Kumar, aged about 33 years, son of Rameshwar Yadav, resident of village Bigha, P.O. and P.S.- Markacho, District-Koderma (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 03-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.258 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under section 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of his wife namely Mon Devi. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that except confessional statement, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that this case has been falsely instituted to harass the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-16 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 15.04.2025 in B.A. No.2914 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.12.2024 as is evident from para-15 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.258 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/