APHC010539992025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2946/2025 Between: 1. CHAKALA OBULA NAIDU,, S/O NARAYANA (LATE), AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC DRIVER (RETIRED) R/O D.NO. 1- 172, SECOND ROAD, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. O ANAND I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE CHARIMAN SURPLUS MANPOWER CELL (SMPC), ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 2. SUGALI DADI PALLAVI, DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE OFFICE ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation and disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P No. 23808 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of W.P No. 23808 of 2025 dated 09.09.2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with personal appearance and permit me to appear online on 09.04.2026 in C.C.No.2946 of 2025 vide orders dated 20.11.2025, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M VENKATA SAI NIKHIL KASHYAP 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Contempt Case No.2946 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the Order, dated 09.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.23808 of 2025. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as for the Respondents submitted that the orders passed by this Court were implemented and the Petitioner was reinstated into the service. 3. In that view, the Contempt Case is closed. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 09.04.2026 chs 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 47 Contempt Case No.2946 of 2025 Date: 09.04.2026 chs