Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167391 (ALL)

AMIT SHAH @ AMIT KUMAR SHAH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9237/2025 · 2025-10-10

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9237 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Aditya Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned AGA for the State- opposite parties no.1 to 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR bearing FIR/Case Crime No.546 of 2025, under Sections 69, 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station- Thakurganj, District- Lucknow. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law within a period of three weeks from today and if the anticipatory bail application is filed within the aforesaid stipulated time, the same may be decided on its own merit. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Amit Shah @ Amit Kumar Shah .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. The writ petition is disposed of. October 10, 2025 RBS/- CRLP No. 9237 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench