Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167347 (ALL)

MONU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/9284/2025 · 2025-09-25

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9284 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Rakesh Kumar and Prateek Dixit, the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Abhay Kumar Singh, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.458 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87 of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Gola, District- Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. alleging that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged 16 years. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., she stated that the applicant loves her for the past two years and was asking her to marry him. Her father and other family members used to abuse and beat her and she had gone with the applicant. 5. The medico-legal examination report of the victim mentions no mark of injury or sign of use of force. 6. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., she stated that no misdeed has been committed against her and upon attaining majority, she would marry the applicant. 7. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 20 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 8. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has been submitted on 18.09.2025. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the consistent statements of the victim wherein she has not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Monu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) levelled any allegation against the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is a young man aged 20 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 27.08.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Monu be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court, unless his/her appearance exempted by the trial Court. September 25, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 9284 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench