UMESH ALIAS UMESHWAR DAFTUWAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,
CRR/530/2020 · 2025-06-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16733 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16733 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:24605
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 530 of 2020 1 - Umesh Alias Umeshwar Daftuwar And Others S/o Akhileshwar Daftuwar Aged About 48 Years R/o Lakhanpur Police Station Lakhanpur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Radheshyam Gupta S/o Kripashankar Gupta Aged About 30 Years R/o Lakhanpur Police Station Lakhanpur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Suryakant Gupta S/o Haricharan Gupta Aged About 51 Years R/o Lakhanpur Police Station Lakhanpur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioners versus State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Arakshi Kendra - Ajak Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 16.06.2025 1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition when the case is called out. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.06.17 10:22:18 +0530
2 2 Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State, is present. 3 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:
“It is, therefore, prayed that revision petition may kindly be allowed and the orders dated 7/3/2020 dismissing the application of discharge may kindly be quashed and the charges framed against the applicatns dated 7/3/2020 may also be quashed in the interest of justice.” 4 In view of the communication made by the trial Court concerned regarding disposal of Special Case No.17/2209, it seems that the criminal case has been disposed of and the applicants were acquitted and as such, the matter has become infructuous. 5 Accordingly, instant criminal revision is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Anu