APHC010224262012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 798/2012 Between: 1. S.ADINARAYANA REDDY S/O S.PEDDA OBULA REDDY, OCC: ASSISTANT MANAGER, ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK, SIDDAVATAM BRANCH, KADAPA DISTRICT, R/O H.NO.39/477-4, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, KADAPA, KADAPA DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K PREETHAMLAL, The Chairman, Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Head Office , Opp: Officers Club, Kadapa, Kadapa District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondent under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately violating the order of this Hon'ble court passed in W.P.No.28998/2011 dated 22-02-2012 passed by his Lordships Justice B.Chandra Kumar in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. B UMA DEVI The Court made the following: 2 :: ORDER :: Heard Sri R.Prasad Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri D.Kodandarami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner died due to Corona. 3. The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 22.02.2012 passed in W.P.No.28998 of 2011. 4. The deceased petitioner filed the writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in not supplying the documents requested by him to submit an explanation to the charge sheet issued by the 1st respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. 5. The said writ petition was disposed of, directing the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the 1st respondent, giving all the particulars as to the documents sought by him and thereafter, the respondents are directed to furnish the same to the petitioner. 6. Since the petitioner died due to Corona, and no steps were taken to bring legal representatives, if any, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 04.03.2025 SNI 3 52 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 798 / 2012 Date: 04.03.2025 SNI