Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16731 (RAJ)

RAJVEER S/O SH. MUNSHI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5527/2025 · 2025-07-03

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24479] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5527/2025 Rajveer S/o Sh. Munshi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Saklupural, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0060/2025 registered at Police Station-Mansalpur, District-Karauli for the offence under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though total recovery of contraband is 34.40 Kg. which is alleged to have been above the commercial quantity but that have been computed as a whole in pursuance of recovery made from this person at single instance. It is evident from the FIR that from the conscious possession of the present petitioners 11.440 gram recovery has been made individually, which is below the commercial quantity. Though there are three criminal cases [2025:RJ-JP:24479] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5527/2025] pending against the present petitioner but in all the three cases, he is bailed out. The other co-accused- Nandkishore and Sukhram @ Ravi have already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 15.05.2025. He again submits that the present petitioner is behind the Bars since 06.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the present petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Rajveer S/o Sh. Munshi shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/3