HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5822 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Piyush Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Ramnagar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, to decide mutation application bearing Case No. RST/6196/2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202504040406196) (Old Case No. 680/2004) - Rajesh and Another Vs. Shyam Bahadur, U/S 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Ramnagar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Ramnagar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide mutation application bearing Case No. RST/6196/2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202504040406196) (Old Case No. 680/2004) - Rajesh and Another Vs. Shyam Bahadur, U/S 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Rakesh Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar, Ramnagar, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench