SMT. CHAMELA DEVI v. TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL RAM SANEHIGHAT, BARABANKI AND ANOTHER
A227/5840/2025 · 2025-09-24
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167294 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167294 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5840 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Ms. Shradha Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. Sri Ram Chandra Singh, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of private respondent no. 2, same is taken on record.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ram Sanehighat, District - Barabanki, to decide Mutation Case No. RST/1851/2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304120201851) - Chamela Devi Vs. Ram kailash, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ram Sanehighat, District - Barabanki, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ram Sanehighat, District - Barabanki, is directed to decide Mutation Case No. RST/1851/2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304120201851) - Chamela Devi Vs. Ram kailash, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
September 24, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shradha Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Chamela Devi .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Ram Sanehighat, Barabanki And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench