RAM JANAK v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL PATTI, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/5893/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167290 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167290 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5893 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh to decide the Case No.T202402570400106, "Ram Lal & another versus Shrinath and others", under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh , considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide theCase No.T202402570400106,
"Ram Lal & another versus Shrinath and others", under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Manoj Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ram Janak .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 KR A227 No. 5893 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench