JAMEEL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. TAX AND REGISTRATION, LUCKNOW AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/11492/2025 · 2025-09-24
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167280 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167280 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11492 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Amit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The captioned writ petition has been filed assailing therein, the transfer order dated 13.06.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration) State Tax, U.P., Lucknow, whereby the petitioner, who is working on the post of Urdu Translator / Principal Assistant, had been transferred from Siddarth Nagar (Gorakhpur Zone) to Prayagraj. 3. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that he suffers from 50% disability and therefore, he is entitled for protection of the provisions made in Clause 5(4) of the Transfer Policy dated 06.05.2025 issued by the State Government for the transfer of the government servants. It has further been contended that in spite of their being categorical provision in the Transfer Policy that the government servants suffering from physical disability shall not be transferred, the petitioner had been transferred vide impugned order dated 13.06.2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also made a submission that the petitioner had already submitted a representation on 17.06.2025 before the Additional Commissioner (Administration) State Tax, U.P., Lucknow, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of by this Court with a direction to the competent authority to consider and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh, Virijendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jameel Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax And Registration, Lucknow And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
decide the said representation, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. 5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents does not have any objection if this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation in light of the policy of transfer laid down by the State Government in Government Order dated 06.05.2025. 6.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 4 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2025, contained at Page-52 of the writ petition, in light of the provisions made in the Transfer Policy dated 06.05.2025, by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of 15 days from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. September 24, 2025 Lokesh Kumar WRIA No. 11492 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench