HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5842 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sheo Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.s 1 to 4. 2. In light of the order proposed to be passed notice to the private respondents is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner purchased land being Gata No. 13M, area 0.706 hectares situated at Village - Kateh, Pargana and Tehsil - Salon, District - Raebareli by means of registered sale deed dated 26.02.2011. After purchase of the said land when petitioner went to take possession over the land, private opposite parties started obstructing his possession. Petitioner moved an application under Section 24(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for demarcation of the said land. Respondent no. 3 after calling for report from the concerned revenue authorities passed order for carrying out demarcation of the said land by means of order dated 15.02.2025. 4. Against the order dated 15.02.2025, appeal was filed before the Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow, by respondent no. 5 which has also been dismissed on 22.05.2025. No revision or appeal has been preferred against the order dated 22.05.2025. It has been submitted that on 09.06.2025, petitioner moved an application before respondent no. 3 for demarcation of the land in question whereupon on 19.06.2025, the Sub Divisional Magistrate had directed the Tehsildar to submit report after installation of Pathar Nasab. It is submitted that till date Tehsildar has not taken any steps in compliance of order dated 19.06.2025. 5. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sheo Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Satish Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously. September 24, 2025 A. Verma A227 No. 5842 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench