1 2025:CGHC:16349-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1245 of 2025 1 - Abhishek Verma S/o Dhannalal Verma Aged About 44 Years R/o Polsai Para, Mahalaxmi Printing Press Gali, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - Nitin Verma S/o Dhannalal Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o Polsai Para, Mahalaxmi Printing Press Gali, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Vinay Verma S/o Dhannalal Verma Aged About 39 Years R/o Polsai Para, Mahalaxmi Printing Press Gali, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Pulgaon, District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - The Superintendent Of Police Durg District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Shri Purushottam Verma S/o Late D.P. Verma Aged About 66 Years R/o Vidyut Nagar, Police Station Padmanabpur, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - Pratik Verma S/o Purushottam Verma Aged About 32 Years R/o Vidyut Nagar, Police Station Padmanabpur, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - Yash Verma S/o Purushottam Verma Aged About 30 Years R/o Vidyut Nagar, Police Station Padmanabpur, Tehsil And District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.04.11 12:01:17 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08.04.2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Heard Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1 & 2 / State. 3. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this CRMP and quash the FIR No. 66/2025 registered in Police Station Pulgaon (ANNEXURE P-1) in the interest of justice.” 4. From perusal of the relief prayed for in the present petition, it transpires that the same is a defective one as the counsel for the petitioners has not mentioned the particulars of the FIR with respect to the date of filing alongwith the offences under which it has been registered and he has only drafted a vague and sketchy prayer. 5. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings. 3 6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Home for Mentally Underdeveloped Children, Mana Camp, District- Raipur (C.G.). 7. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 & 2 / State is present. 8. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet