Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167203 (ALL)

SRI AVEG MEHROTRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF STATE TAX AND ANOTHER

WTAX/1019/2025 · 2025-09-26

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 1019 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "I. issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned ex-parte demand order and show cause notice 25.04.2024 and 15.12.2023 (April 2018 and March 2019) issued by the Commercial Tax Officer State Tax Jurisdiction Sitapur, Sector-2 Sitapur Lucknow II Uttar Pradesh i.e., the respondent no.2, under section 73 of the State Goods & Service Tax Act (Annexure Nos. 4 and 2 to the writ petition, respectively). II. issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned notice and demand order." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 26, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Sri Aveg Mehrotra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of State Tax And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench