HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1362 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant as well as Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No.315 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, Section 4/10 of Forest Conservation Act & Sections 3/28 of the Uttar Pradesh Transit of Timber and Other Forest Produce Rules, 1978, registered at Police Station- Paraspur, District- Gonda. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by a Sub-Inspector of Police on 02.08.2025 against four persons, including the applicant, stating that on receipt of an information from a mukhbir that the accused persons had stealthily cut down a Mango tree and had taken its wood, the police intercepted the accused persons and the applicant escaped and the other three persons were arrested and wood of Mango tree was recovered. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in four other cases has been disclosed in paras 13 & 14 of the affidavit, in all of which he has been released on bail. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the alleged offences carry a maximum punishment up to 3 years Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manoj Singh @ Yuvraj Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home .....Opposite Party(s) 6. The learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the application and he has submitted that the investigation in the matter is still going on. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court : (i) that the applicant shall make himself/herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v) that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. September 24, 2025 S. Shivhare NABAIL No. 1362 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench