APHC010148532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2025 Between: 1. MYLAPALLI RAMULU,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGE 75 YEARS, 2. MYLAPALLI YARRAYYA,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ RAMUDU, AGE 55 YEARS, 3. MYLAPALLI RAMU,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ RAMUDU, AGE 51 YEARS, 4. MYLAPALLI APPANNA,, S/O LATE AGE 45 YEARS, (ALL ARE R/O KOVVADA MATCHILESAM (V), RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT) 1. SWAPNIL DINAKAR PUNDKAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. K LAKSHMANA RAO, THE ACQUISITION), NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, GOVT, OF INDIA UNDERTAKING. DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY, KOWADA, OFFICE AT OLD BUS STAND, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. CH RANGAIAH, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFF SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. N PRASADA RAO, THE TAHSILDAR, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2025 MYLAPALLI RAMULU,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGE 75 YEARS, MYLAPALLI YARRAYYA,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ RAMUDU, AGE 55 YEARS, MYLAPALLI RAMU,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ RAMUDU, MYLAPALLI APPANNA,, S/O LATE CHINNAVADU @ LAXMUDU, AGE 45 YEARS, (ALL ARE R/O KOVVADA MATCHILESAM (V), RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER(S) AND SWAPNIL DINAKAR PUNDKAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. K LAKSHMANA RAO, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION), NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, GOVT, OF INDIA UNDERTAKING. DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY, KOWADA, OFFICE AT OLD BUS STAND, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. CH RANGAIAH, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFF SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. N PRASADA RAO, THE TAHSILDAR, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI MYLAPALLI RAMULU,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGE 75 YEARS, MYLAPALLI YARRAYYA,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ MYLAPALLI RAMU,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ RAMUDU, CHINNAVADU @ LAXMUDU, AGE 45 YEARS, (ALL ARE R/O KOVVADA MATCHILESAM (V), ...PETITIONER(S) SWAPNIL DINAKAR PUNDKAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION), NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, GOVT, OF INDIA UNDERTAKING. DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY, KOWADA, OFFICE AT OLD BUS STAND, SRIKAKULAM, CH RANGAIAH, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, N PRASADA RAO, THE TAHSILDAR, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to initiate the Contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish them suitably U/s.lO to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the orders dt.30.12.2022 passed in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020 by His Lordship the Hon ble Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO 2. 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020 and there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the Contempt Case. 3. To the said submission, Ms. M.Devi Sree, learned counsel, representing Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that she has no instructions from the petitioners. Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months from today, if the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020 has not complied with. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 16.04.2026 MP 4 133 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:810 of 2025 Dated: 16.04.2026 MP