Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16717 (AP)

KATTAMURI NAGESWARA RAO v. AJITH KUMAR SAXENA

CC/1475/2025 · 2025-07-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010223452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1475/2025 Between: 1. KATTAMURI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. K. NOOKA RAJU, UNEMPLOYEE, HINDU, AGED 30 YEARS. RESIDENT OF D.NO.30- 52-4, R.H.C,VADLAPUDI, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 046. ...PETITIONER AND 1. AJITH KUMAR SAXENA, S/o Not Known, Rep. by chief managing Director / Chairmain cum -Managing Director, Visakhapatnam Steel plant, Visakhapatnam. (Respondent No.4 Impleaded as per co Dt.21/03/2023 vide lA No. 2 of a 2023 in W.P.No. 2211/2019.) ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to for the reasons stated in above this Honble Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience of the orders of this Honorable Court passed in W.P.No. 2211 of 2019 dated 04.04.2024 passed by Her Lordship's Justice Smt JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, under Sections 10 to 12, 14, 15 and 16 of Act 70 of 1971 Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VENKATA SUBBA RAJU Counsel for the Contemnor: 2 1. V SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: ORDER : This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner due to the non- compliance of the orders dated 04.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.2211 of 2019. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the orders dated 04.04.2024 passed this Court in W.P.No.2211 of 2019 has been complied by the respondent No.2. 3. Recording the submission made, this Contempt Case is closed, since the order has been complied by the respondent No.2, the question of contempt does not arise. There shall be no orders as costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 29-07-2025 MH 3 30 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA C.C.No.1475 of 2025 Dt.29.07.2025 MH