Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167152 (ALL)

BANSHI LAL v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 6 OTHERS

A227/5859/2025 · 2025-09-25

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5859 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Gyanoday Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow, to decide Restoration Application bearing No. 1783 of 2023 for restoration of Revision No. 145 of 1991- 1992 - Banshi Lal Vs. Ram Bilas, U/S 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow, is directed to decide Restoration Application bearing No. 1783 of 2023 for restoration of Revision No. 145 of 1991-1992 - Banshi Lal Vs. Ram Bilas, U/S 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 25, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanoday Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Banshi Lal .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench