ARVIND SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE TAX GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/1009/2025 · 2025-09-26
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 1009 of 2025
. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26.12.2022 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act as well as the order dated 27.12.2024 whereby the appeal was dismissed as being beyond limitation.
4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no date for hearing was fixed or informed to the petitioner. The said notices of hearing was uploaded on the 'additional tab' which could not be noticed.
5. It is argued that the said issue was dealt with by this Court in Writ Tax No.855 of 2024 (Ola Fleet Technologies Private Limited v. State of UP and 2 Ors.), vide judgment dated 22.07.2024.
6. On the said sole ground, following the judgment in the case of Ola Fleet Technologies Private Limited (supra), present petition is allowed.
7. Orders dated 26.12.2022 & 27.12.2024 are quashed.
8. Matter is remanded to the assessing authority to pass fresh order after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arvind Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. State Tax Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. September 26, 2025 akverma WTAX No. 1009 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench