APHC010223492021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12841/2021 Between: 1. BULLE PEDDAIAH, S/O.LATE.B.PEDDANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.3-163, GARLADINNE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAYATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. KIRAN KUMAR REDDY, SUB-INSPECTOR, GARLADINNE P.S. ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. M SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O.M.RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.2-12, OC COLONY, MUDIGALLU VILLAGE, KALYANDURG MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. K CHANDRAMOULI, S/O.K.NAGESWAR GOWD, AGED ABOUT 45YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.1-65, SIDDARAMPURAM VILLAGE, B.K.SAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent No.3 in interfering with civil dispute by entering into Schedule Property under the influence and instigation of Respondents No.4 to 5 is illegal, against to law, violation of the Article 300-A and consequently direct the Official Respondents to not to interfere with Schedule Property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the official Respondent not to interfere in Civil Dispute between Petitioners and Un-official Respondents pending disposal of this Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KRISHNA CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent No.3 in interfering with civil dispute by entering into Schedule Property under the influence and instigation of Respondents Nos.4 to 5 is illegal, against to law, violation of the Article 300-A and consequently direct the Official Respondents to not to interfere with Schedule Property and pass……” 2. Sri M.Krishna Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.09.2025 SNI 4 62 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12841 of 2021 Dt.17.09.2025 SNI