Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167128 (ALL)

NAREND KUMAR SONKER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. EXCISE DEPTT. AND ANOTHER

A227/5807/2025 · 2025-09-24

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5807 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard Ms. Hema Singh holding brief of Sri Birendra Kumar Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the State respondent has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Claim Petition No.1631 of 2022 pending before respondent no.2. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the Claim Petition No.1631 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 24, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Balram Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shikhar Anand (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Narend Kumar Sonker .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Excise Deptt. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench