RAM SUKH AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 2 OTHERS
A227/5810/2025 · 2025-09-24
Jaspreet Singh
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167126 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167126 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5810 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the State respondents has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of the recall application no.491 of 2021 pending in the Original Suit no.202 of
2017. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) South Room no.24 Sultanpur to consider and finally decide the recall application no.491 of 2021 pending in the Original Suit no.202 of 2017 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 24, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Ram Sukh And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Sultanpur And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench