HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5894 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow to decide the Case No.1033 of 2025, (Computerized Case No.C202510000001033), "Pappi Yadav vs. Sarvendra Kumar & others", under Section 207 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 / Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Case No.1033 of 2025, (Computerized Case No.C202510000001033), Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Srivastava, Manmohan Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anil Kumar Yadav, Dilip Kumar Pandey Sarvendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) "Pappi Yadav vs. Sarvendra Kumar & others", under Section 207 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 KR A227 No. 5894 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench