GAYATRI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LABOUR DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/11347/2025 · 2025-09-22
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167112 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167112 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11347 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
Learned counsel for petitioner prays for and is granted liberty to change the nomenclature of opposite party no. 1 today during the course of day. Under challenge is the order dated 12.9.2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from the Prosecution Wing to P.S. Phoolbehar, District Kheri and the relieving order dated 15.12.2025.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned transfer order will affect the mid-term examination schedule of the petitioner's daughter, who is studying in Class VII, particularly since proceedings for divorce have been initiated with regard to petitioner and her husband. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without interfering into the impugned order, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 6-Superintendent of Police, Kheri, Lakhimpur Kheri or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is submitted before the concerned authority.
4. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition stands disposed of. (Manish Mathur,J.) September 22, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Tripathi, Pandit Venktesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Gayatri Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Labour Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench