IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12278 OF 2025 Between: 1. Koppisetty Vijaya Raju, S/o. late Subramanyam, Aged 50 years, Occ: Agriculturist, R/o Nagaram Village, Mamidikuduru Mandal, Dr Br Ambedkar Konaseema District. Koppisettty Vijaya Raju, S/o. late Subramanyam, Aged 47 years, Occ: Agriculturist, R/o. Nagaram Village, Mamidikudum Mandal, Dr Br Ambedkar Konaseema District. Koppisettty Veeraganesh, S/o. Late Subramanyam, Aged 45 years, Occ Agriculturist, R/o. Nagaram Village, Mamidikudum Mandal, Dr Br Ambedkar Konaseema District, 2. 3. ...PETITIONERS AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada Town, Kakinada District. The Station House Officer, Mamidikudum, Mamidikudum Mandal, Kakinada District. Koppisetty Ramakrishna, S/o. Late Veeraju, Age 65 Years, Occ: Agriculturist. R/o. Nagaram Village, Mamidikudum Mandal, Dr Br Ambedkar Konaseema District. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents No 2 and 3 to take steps in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioners against the unofficial respondents No 4, dated on 04-07-2024, high headedly. unofficial respondent illegal interferes with peaceful possession and enjoyment of agriculture land to an extent of land Ac 00.20 cents in Sy No 17-2 at Vandravada, Samarlkota Mandal, Kakinada District, and abusing filthy language, and trying to attack us on 04-07-2024 and not allowing me 'our land, we made representation to the PS Mamidikuduru for police protection, even without considering that the petitioners request were living thereat, in not taking any measures for providing protection to the petitioners and in spite of direction the 2 representation of the petitioners in spite of lapse of more than 21 months, as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith consider the representation dated 04-07-2024 and to provide protection to the petitioners. nd respondent on the lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioners dated taking 04-07-2024, by necessary steps for protecting the life and limb of the petitioners, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI M. CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4 ; NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER ¥ T ■ APHC01O222892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12278/2025 Between: Koppisetty Vijaya Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.12278 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for Home. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondents 2 and 3 in registering the complaint dated 04.07.2024 against the unofficial respondent. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the said representation is not before the police. 4. Considering the submissions, the petitioner is at liberty to submit the fresh representation to the 3'"^ respondent. On receipt of the same, the 3'"' respondent shall consider the same by following the procedure as contemplated under Section 173(3) of the B.N.S.S. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR closed. //TRUE COPY// f To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police. Kakinada Town. • The Station House Officer, Mamidikudum Kakinada District. 4. One CC to Sri M. Chalapathi, Advocate [OPUCl 5. TwoCCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 6. Three C.D. Copies. Kakinada District. Mamidikudum Mandal, Pradesh. [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.12278 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THEW.P. WITHOUT COSTS