HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45556 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today by learned AGA for the State is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 3. This bail application has been moved on behalf of the accused-applicant/ Shyamlal Bhuiyan, for grant of bail, in Case Crime No. 554/2025, under Section 143(5) B.N.S., Police Station Mughalsarai, District Chandauli, during pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that, the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case and has not committed any offence, as alleged by the prosecution. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that, allegations of child labour and trafficking have been alleged against the accused-applicant, however, the details of deployment of children, as to where they were likely to be engaged, have not been disclosed in detail. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that, the accused-applicant is languishing in jail in this matter since 6.11.2025 without having any criminal antecedents and there is no likelihood that the accused-applicant, after release on bail, may flee from the process of law or will misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for bail of the applicant and submits that, having regard to the manner, in which the crime has been committed, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shyamlal Bhuiyan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Having considered the rival contentions of the parties and the facts that, no detail of deployment of children has been disclosed, as to whether where are they deployed after kidnapping; the accused-applicant is languishing in jail in this matter, since 6.11.2025, without having any criminal antecedents and keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered view that applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the accused-applicant/ Shyamlal Bhuiyan, involved in aforesaid case, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the Court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 10. Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the case. April 2, 2026 Gurpreet Singh BAIL No. 45556 of 2025 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad