Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16707 (RAJ)

MOOLA RAM S/O THANA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6229/2025 · 2025-04-25

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17639] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6229/2025 1. Moola Ram S/o Thana Ram, Aged About 59 Years 7 Months, R/o Regaro Ka Mohalla, Padoo Kalan, Nagaur, Rajasthan. 2. Manak Lal Jaroli S/o Shanti Lal Jaroli, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Jain Mohalla, Morvan, Dungla, Badi Sadri, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. 3. Pitram Meena S/o Ramkishore Meena, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Meena Basti, Babai, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Nathu Mohammed Sherani S/o Ijaj Khan Sherani, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Najmiya Mohalla, Sherani Abad, Nagaur, Rajasthan. 5. Narendra Kumar Yadav S/o Bhim Singh Yadav, Aged About 59 Years, R/o L-97, Sector No. 14, Indira Nagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Madan Lal Suman S/o Heera Lal Suman, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 6, Near Aspatal, Maliyon Ke Mandir Ke Piche, Ward No. 11, Anta, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/04/2025 1. Six writ petitioners have filed this joint writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning their place of posting after extending promotion at different places. [2025:RJ-JP:17639] (2 of 2) [CW-6229/2025] 2. Cause of action for each petitioner is separate and it is not a case of common or joint cause of action. 3. Counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an independent and separate writ petition for and on behalf of each petitioner. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/38