ASUMI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.
BAIL/9268/2025 · 2025-09-24
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 167038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9268 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Case Crime No.562 of 2021, under Sections 308, 323, 504 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Maholi, District Sitapur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 25.11.2021 against four persons, including the applicants, stating that all the accused persons had assaulted the informant and his family members due to which one person Amar fell unconscious and was taken to the hospital. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicants are innocent and they have no criminal history. 5. The learned counsel for the applicants stated that a non-cognizable report was lodged from the side of the applicants' also and 9 persons from the complainant's side and 3 persons from the applicants' side have received injuries in the incident. Both the main accused persons have already been granted bail in the present case and copies of their bail orders have been annexed with the bail application. 6. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the application but he could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Asumi And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
enlargement of the applicants on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicants - Asumi and Chhotkanne be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
September 24, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9268 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench