Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167037 (ALL)

SHAFIULLAH MOHAMMAD ISLAM KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

/5800/2025 · 2025-09-23

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5800 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for expeditious disposal of Case No. T202404680904767, U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Shafiullah Mohd. Islam Vs. Adnan Hashim Ali Siddiqui and other). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Baldirai, District Sultanpur, is directed to decide Case No. T202404680904767, U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Shafiullah Mohd. Islam Vs. Adnan Hashim Ali Siddiqui and other)., expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Singh, Gargi Prakash Misra, Parikshit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shafiullah Mohammad Islam Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5800 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench