Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 167031 (ALL)

AMARJEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9270/2025 · 2025-09-24

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9270 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Syed Ahmad Mehdi, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.365 of 2025, under Sections 87, 137(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S., registered at Police Station Inayatnagar, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. alleging that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged about 10 years. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS, she stated that she is aged about 14 years, she studies in Class- VII, her mother used to beat her and ask her to go with the applicant. Her mother had given Rs.1500/- and her parents turned her out of her home and therefore, she had gone with the applicant. She stated that the applicant did not commit any misdeed with her and she declined to undergo medico-legal examination. 5. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the victim stated that the applicant had enticed her away but she stated he did not make physical relations with her. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent young boy aged 19 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 7. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the application and he has submitted that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Ahmad Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amarjeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) the investigation in the matter is still going on. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the statements of the victim coupled with the fact the applicant is a young boy aged 19 years, having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 24.07.2025, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Amarjeet be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 24, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9270 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench