SAMEER KHAN @ NATA @ MOHMMAD SAMEER v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/3923/2025 · 2025-04-30
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16701 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16701 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3923-2025 Date of Decision: 30.04.2025 Sameer Khan @ Nata @ Mohmmad Sameer
...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for Mr. S.S. Sarwara, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. *** RAJESH BHARDWAJ
, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.232, dated 09.11.2024, under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), 324(2), 351(3), 190, 191(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Earlier 323, 324, 341, 426, 326, 506, 148, 149 IPC), registered at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala, Annexure P-1. Vide order dated 23.01.2025, while granting interim protection, the petitioner was directed to join investigation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance to the order passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation and as such his interim bail may be made absolute. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI, Jagdish Kumar has stated that petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, interim order dated 23.01.2025 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. Petition stands allowed.
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 30.04.2025
JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Parveen Kumar 2025.05.01 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document