SHYAM NARAYAN TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
C372/135/2025 · 2025-09-26
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 135 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. On an objection raised by learned AGA that this appeal has wrongly been filed showing the name of the complainant, whereas F.I.R. was lodged under the POCSO Act, Sri Vivek Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh with correct description.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
3. As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, office is directed to return the certified copy/copies annexed with this appeal to learned counsel for the appellant after keeping the photocopy/photocopies of the same on record in accordance with law. September 26, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vivek Kumar Pandey, Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Shyam Narayan Tiwari .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench