RAM KRISHNA @ RAM KRISHNA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO AND ANOTHER
CRLR/1106/2025 · 2025-09-26
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1106 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri V.K.Shahi, learned AGA for the State.
2. By means of present revisionist, the revisionist has assailed the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C. First), Ambedkar Nagar, in Session Trial No. 53 of 2023 (State Versus Balram Yadav and others) arising out from FIR/Case Crime No.464 of 2019, under Sections 324, 352, 325, 308 I.P.C., Police Station - Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Taking note of the facts of the case including the statement(s) of PW-1 and PW-2 on record as also the basis of the exoneration of the revisionist, which would fall under the plea of alibi, and the basic story indicated in the F.I.R. and the law in this regard, according to which the trial court is under obligation to consider the evidence led before it, on being confronted, learned counsel for the revisionist says that the present application be disposed of with liberty to the revisionist to appear before the concerned court seeking benefit of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, according to which once the investigation is over and the charge-sheet is filed then the accused should be asked to appear before the Court concerned and should furnish bail to the satisfaction of the trial court.
4. The aforesaid has been opposed by the learned A.G.A
5. Accordingly, the revision is disposed of, with liberty as prayed for. September 26, 2025 Mohit Singh/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ram Chandra Dwivedi, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ram Krishna @ Ram Krishna Yadav .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench