MEENA CHAUDHARY ALIAS MEENA BHARTI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
ABA/1187/2025 · 2025-11-06
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16699 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16699 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9757 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
ABA No. 1187 of 2025
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mrs. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application since the defect(s) cannot be rectified.
4. In view of the submission as made above, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 06.11.2025 PR
2025:UHC:9757