Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16699 (JHR)

CHHOTU MIAN ALIAS MD AFTAB ANSARI ALIAS AFTAB v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3243/2025 · 2025-06-13

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15369 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3243 of 2025 ----- Chhotu Mian @ Md. Aftab Ansari @ Aftab, S/o Md. Mukhtar Ansari, R/o Qtr. No.15, Belgaria Colony, Palani, P.O. Baliapur, P.S. Baliapur, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand) .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ramchander Sahu, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, AddI. P.P. …...... 02/ 13.06.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of Sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 apprehending his arrest for the offences under Sections 147/148/149/323/324/353/394/427/307/120(B) of IPC. 3. The learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. This petitioner and others armed with hockey sticks, sword etc. attacked the police personnels. They snatched the official rifle from the injured Home Guard namely, Anil Kumar Pandey. There is also allegation that they have pelted stones. 5. Considering the nature of allegations where the police personnels were attacked when they are performing duty. Even if the other persons have been granted anticipatory bail. I find that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.41 of 2019, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Dhanbad, stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./