MANESH PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/9474/2025 · 2025-09-23
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166983 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166983 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9474 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s) as well as Shri Manu Dixit, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.3 and perused the material available on record.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the recovery issued against the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent- Bank states that an amount of Rs. 3,39,640/- is due and payable by the petitioner.
4. The Counsel for the petitioner seeks some time to pay the entire outstanding.
5. In view of above, the present writ petition is disposed of providing that the recovery issued against the petitioner shall not be affected subject to depositing Rs.50,000/- on or before 30th November, 2025.
6. The remaining outstanding amount along with interest shall be paid by the petitioner in five equal installments. Meaning thereby, the first installment shall be paid by 28.02.2026, the second installment by 31.05.2026, third installment by 31.08.2026, fourth installment by 30.11.2026 and the last installment with overdue interest by 28.02.2027.
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Milan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manu Dixit Manesh Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. In case of default, the present order shall automatically come to an end and the respondent Bank will have right to recover the loan amount in accordance with law. . September 23, 2025/Praveen WRIC No. 9474 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench