RAJARAM DWIVEDI @ RAJARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/3111/2025 · 2025-09-25
Shree Prakash Singh
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166973 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166973 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3111 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of SC/ST Act has been filed for quashing of the chargesheet No. 273 of 2023, dated 19.09.2023 in Sessions Case No. 622 of 2024; State of U.P. Vs. Rajaram Dwivedi, arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 0282 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) Da, 3(1) Dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station Nasirabad, District Raebareli and summoning order dated 28.05.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Raebareli, as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has never involved in committing the offence, as has been mentioned in the First Information Report. He added that due to enmity, his name has been planted in the First Information Report and thereafter he has been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the learned trial court. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vyas Narayan Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rajaram Dwivedi @ Rajaram .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
not want to press the criminal appeal and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). The instant criminal appeal is disposed of accordingly. September 25, 2025 kkv/ CRLA No. 3111 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench