KAMLESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/11338/2025 · 2025-09-23
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 166961 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11338 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The captioned writ petition has been filed by the petitioner inter alia praying therein for the following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the respondent authority no. 3 concerned i.e. District Panchayat Raj Officer District Hardoi directing there by to decide representation of petitioner dated 01.09.2025 by passing speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time frame deemed appropriate to this hon'ble court contained with this writ petition as annexure no. 1."
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had already submitted a representation on 01.09.2025 to the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Hardoi detailing therein his entire grievance. He further submits that a direction may be issued by this Court commanding the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Hardoi to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents does not have any objection if this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2025. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kamlesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2025 by passing a speaking and reasoned order, within a period of two months from today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated upon merits of the case. September 23, 2025 Lokesh Kumar WRIA No. 11338 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench